Wednesday, October 10, 2012

Pontypool

The power of words is tremendous. Words have incited revolutions in religions, governments and society in general, the printed word is still one of the greatest mediums ever and there's a certain solace in listening to a competent speaker talk. But what if words could infect. Literally. Cause thousands of people to become sick in their minds like a virus causes people to become sick in their bodies? What if certain words had the power to make people kill when they were understood correctly  What if people become little more than zombies when they were fully infected with these words?

Pontypool isn't your average zombie film. It's more about the claustrophobia of being couped up in an oppressive enviroment while meanwhile the world around you falls apart. It spins a new idea with zombie horror, but like I said it only barely qualifies. Does it work? Well Pontypool succeeds with intent but almost fails with delivery. I say almost because there's definitely a mood struck with this film and it carries through to the end despite have some fumbling moments with the dialogue. It's definitely not perfect but the atmosphere becomes near pitch perfect by the middle of the film and what more could really ask for?

But I'm getting to the conclusion before I talk about the meat of the movie. Pontypool is about a radio shock dj, Grant Mazzy (Stephen McHattie), turned radio broadcaster for a small town called Pontypool  He's only just got this job as a radio broadcaster having lost his job at a bigger station in a bigger place. The film opens with Mazzy driving through a blizzard to work. He pulls over to get his bearings while the snow bears down around him. While pulled over a young woman without winter gear on slaps his window, when he rolls it down to ask what she needs she begins repeating his words and seems confused and distressed. He debates calling 911, but decides against it and continues on to work. The radio station is in the basement of an old church and it's here we meet the other two primary characters of the film, Sydney Briar (Lisa Houle) the station manager and Laurel-Ann Drummond (Georgina Reilly). He starts his radio show off by giving short updates and getting a weather report from the "man in the sky" Ken Loney (Rick Roberts, voice only). Then starts into a rant about drug dealers. He's cut off by Sydney who tells him that the small town doesn't go for that sort of discourse and to keep it to things like school closures.

Mazzy reluctantly goes along with it until a news story comes in about a hostage situation. While it seems intense it's soon revealed that the hostage takers were two drunk fisherman who were pulling their shack off the ice (or are they?) Mazzy continues with the show, revealing how miserable he really is to be stuck where he is during the winter months. Sydney Briar feigns sympathy and encourages him to just stick with the topics the towns folk want to see. This first act of the film works against itself. Why it sets up the character of Mazzy particularly well Sydney Briar falls flat and Laurel-Ann is simply uninteresting, the only thing being revealed about her is that she served with the military in Afghanistan. The dialogue is rough here. It's not that it's really poorly written, but instead it comes across as an early draft of the script. The actors are competent  but not excellent, though McHattie does stand out above the rest.

Shortly after the exchange between Briar and Mazzy a report comes in from Ken Lonney of a riot down town near the office of a Dr. Mendez. He reports that people are flooding into the building and then, apparently destroy it from the inside. After this he notes two military helicopters flying over. (Ken is revealed just before this scene to be in an old pick up truck, not a helicopter). Then he get's cut off, trying frantically to leave the scene.

With no official news of what's going on and no other eye-witnesses to the events, the stations precedes with it's planned program. They interview a family who dresses like fantasy versions of Arabs (complete with tacky face-paint) who's group is named Lawrence and the Arabians,  and they sing a song. After the song ends one of the girls looks distressed and begins to repeat her words over and over again, much like the woman in the beginning of the film. The family is ushered out and Sydney and Laurel-Ann confirm to Mazzie that they have eye-witnesses on the phone. They put the first on and he begins repeating the same phrase over and over again. Cutting him off they've managed to contact a police officer and he speaks for a few moments before becoming drowned out by background noise. Shortly after this Ken calls them again.

Ken has managed to hide in an old grain silo. He describes mobs of people wandering the country side and pulling people out of their cars apparently eating and dismembering them. He panics and after a loud crash he reveals that one of them has broke through the silo and appears to be missing his arms. He says the man is whispering something over and over again but is cut off by a loud transmission. In French a warning is given to not use terms of endearment, anything to do with conflict and to completely avoid the English language, and moreover not to translate this to English.

Shortly after the transmission Ken calls back, revealing the young mans last words to be the sound of a baby's voice repeating "Mommy" over and over again. The transmission is cut off again and Mazzy has a melt down and attempts to flee the station. He get's outside but is forced back in by a mob.

This sequence, and nearly the entire film itself, very little is shown to us. What is revealed is done solely through the dialogue. We never see one of the infected through this sequence, and we the audience are never entirely sure what's real and what isn't, we only have the character's words for it. I must admit that I was annoyed at this to begin with. There's an old adage in story-telling to show not tell, and I felt the writer and director (Tony Burgess and Bruce McDonald respectively) were cheating us a bit by not giving us more of a hint. Then as the film carried on the tension built, and built and built. There's a certain paranoia in the air by the time Mazzy tries to leave the station, and it's only carried to new heights by the sequence of obituaries that detail the death and carnage leaping from one person to another all the while showing them in a black and white montage peacefully and patiently standing in front of the camera, waiting for a photo-op. And while it certainly heavily implied that he actually gave those obits, there's a little bit of doubt, it's nearly a dream sequence and it actually breaks up the action nicely for the third act.

The third act starts with Laurel-Ann becoming infected by whatever it is that is infecting people. Dr. Mendez also appears at this time, entering the station and apparently uninfected, having escaped the mobs by crawling through the woods. He takes Sydney into the booth with Mazzy and shuts the door. He explains that Laurel-Ann has become infected and is hunting for them, and will soon begin stalking them all but they should be safe in the booth as it's sound-proof. Laurel-Ann begins to throw herself against the glass of the booth over and over again. She becomes more agitated through out this sequence which involves one last phone call from Ken who has also succumbed to the virus. Dr. Mendez explains that a virus has become part of language itself and that once people are able to hear and understand certain words they become infected. Their next move is to kill or infect somebody else and then kill themselves (murder suicide is the most common way people die). At this point Laurel-Ann vomits blood on the glass of the booth and the mob breaks down the door to the radio station and pours inside. (This is the only real moment of gore in the film)

In an effort to conceal themselves from the mob Sydney, Mazzy and Dr. Mendez turn out all the lights and mics and grab notebooks to write messages to each other. They formulate a plan to lure the mob back outside by recording the message "Sydney Briar is still alive" and playing it on the station loud speaker outside. Shortly after this the Dr. becomes infected and in an effort to stop himself he switches back and forth between different languages. Mazzy and Sydney flee the booth and move to the kitchen area but are attacked by one of the girls from the earlier interview on the way.

They kill the girl and begin searching for weapons and food when the power shuts off, cutting off the recording. Back up generators soon kick in but the mob returns having nothing to keep them occupied outside any more. Mazzy and Briar flee into a pantry, with the Dr (who is still trying to overcome his own infection). The mob begins pounding on the door but the Doc slips out the window and lures them away with the message from the recording. After hours in the pantry of writing on the walls and in the notebooks Sydney, drunk, begins to stress over killing the girl from earlier. She begins to repeat the word "kill" over and over. Mazzy, knowing that Sydney is becoming infected begins to tell her that "kill means kiss" not what she thinks. He gets her to repeat it several times and she seems to come out of it. Convinced that he's found a way to stop the virus he goes back on the air. Soon a voice in French comes on the telling people that Mazzy himself is infected and that the broadcast needs to be shut down. It then counts down backwards from 10 to 0 and the screen goes black and the movie ends.

The film works. Hell I even like the idea of words transmitting some sort of infection like a virus. I will admit that the premise seemed absurd at first blush, but the movie actually does it's job of building up the idea. The film itself almost feels like a play. It could be a play with some minor rewrites and I think that would be brilliant. Apparently the screenwriter Tony Burgess and the director Bruce McDonald also wrote it as a radio play as well. There're a limited amount of characters, which in a film like this works quite well. There's no need for more. All of them are trapped in one location, and there's a claustrophobic feeling during the entire film that is not pressing but still present and manages to create a sense of foreboding that gently slides into doom. While the film doesn't show us much, and as I noted above has a tendency to tell what's happening rather than show it does display good use of the rule of three. (Who would have thought that a pseudo-zombie horror flick could be used to demonstrate story-telling techniques). First we hear about the rioting, then the infected, then finally we see the what's going on when Laurel-Ann becomes infected and the mob shows up.

The acting is sufficient. Not great but a little better than average for a horror movie. That being said McHattie's Mazzy is interesting. The character is compelling and there's a desperation there that I think many people can identify with. Credit for this solely lies on the shoulders of Stephen McHattie. The script itself is rough in spots, and definitely could have used some rewrites. I blame the script, more than the actress, for making Sydney Briar unlikable  That being said the filmmakers manage to take what seems to be an absurd idea and make it compelling, if not quite terrorizing and that's great. This movie is listed as a zombie film, and I suppose that is true in the broader sense, but it definitely doesn't fall into a lot of the zombie movie cliches and thank god for that! It's definitely worth checking out and there's very little gore in the film so even non-horror fans can sample it. Just remember, the premise seems absurd but unlike another horror movies with an absurd premise (The Happening I'm looking at you) this one is actually compelling.

3 beards out of 5.

Labels:

Sunday, October 07, 2012

An American Werewolf in London

[I'm going to be reviewing several movies that are either the first in a series franchise, or have sequels. I'm not however going to be looking at any more films beyond the first. Simply put, most movies are not made with the idea of sequels in mind. Any movie that comes after the first film is made is typically coasting on the coattails of the original film. My intent isn't to comment on a franchise, just the original film, looking at it as if it had no sequel(s)]

[I spoil the hell out of this movie, so if you haven't seen it but want to watch it with out spoilers, read no further.]

John Landis is a director with a lot of hits and misses. Of the movies I've seen of his I'd say only about half are worth watching. He is decidedly a director of comedies, at least that's where his talent shines. The director of classic comedies like: National Lampoon's Animal House, The Blues Brothers, Trading Spaces and The Three Amigo's it's easy to tell where Landis passions lay.

That being said it is seemingly odd for a director who focuses so much on comedy to delve into horror. His first film Schock (which I have not seen... yet) is a comedy-horror, so like many director's he did get his start in the film industry with this tried and true genre, though it's not his most well known film. That would go to Animal House, nor is it his most well known horror movie (of which he only has a few), that would go to An American Werewolf in London. 

An American Werewolf in London, as the title indicates, is a werewolf film. It's a simple enough plot, one that's been done over and over again with werewolf movies. Somebody get's bitten by a werewolf, turns into a werewolf and kills people, they are horrified to discover that they are a werewolf, and are eventually killed by a mob. Landis turns the genre on it's head, well that's not quite right, he trips and knocks it down a bit. The movie starts out with two American backpackers hiking through the moors of northern England. David Kessler (played by David Naughton) and Jack Goodman (played by Griffin Dunne) after hiking in the chilly English country side enter an inhospitable tavern to escape the cold night air. After it becomes apparent that they aren't wanted, they flee the tavern but given the cryptic warning to beware of the moon and to stick to the roads as they do. Ignoring both pieces of advice they soon become lost on the moors and are attacked by a beast. Jack is killed and David is mauled by the monster before the folks in the village, feeling guilty for letting the boys go, show up and kill the animal who quickly changes into a man.

Skip to three weeks later David is in a hospital being tended to by the beautiful young nurse Alex Price (Jenny Agutter). David's told that he and Jack were attacked by a madman and the case is closed on what happened to him. He insists to the doctor that he and his Jack were attacked by a large animal, not a man and that something is being kept hidden from them. The doctor humors him at first, but David's persistence begins to even have an affect on the him, and there's a nagging feeling that he has been lied to as David's wounds were cleaned and bound before any doctor saw him. David's himself is plagued by nightmares, first it's him running nude through the woods, and hunting animals. Then he as a vivid nightmare of a group of monsters in military uniforms murdering his family. Soon he starts seeing Jack as he appeared when he last saw him, mauled and torn up, Jack claims that he will be forced to walk to the Earth in limbo until the last of the werewolf bloodline that killed him is killed, that of course being David.

David's slight insanity and boyish charm makes Nurse Price fall for him, and when he's discharged from the hospital she takes him to her flat. While there alone and unattended the full moon turns him into a werewolf and goes on a killing spree through out the city. The next morning he wakes up nude at the wolf pen in the zoo and makes his way back to Alex's flat. The doctor having gone to the village the day before has become convinced there's something to David's psychosis, as the villagers all seemed to have it too. The doctor calls Alex to have her bring David to see him so that he can be taken into custody, worried that David had something to do with the six murders the night before. David escapes Alex, tries to get arrested, makes one last phone call home and is finally lured into a porno theater in Picaddilly Circus by Jack where he's asked to commit suicide by Jack and the six people he killed the night before. He changes while in the theater and kills everybody inside and an usher that goes to check on the disturbance. The police show up and try to blockade him in but he escapes and reigns havoc in Trafalgar Square until he's finally cornered in an alley. Alex makes one last plea to the beast that is David, but he leaps to attack and is killed by the assembled police officers.

The movie does some things that are notable: the idea that the dead continue to walk the earth after they are killed by the werewolf is new, at least in film. It's something that isn't touched on in other films of the genre that I have ever seen. Also the movie ignores the idea of needing silver or a silver bullet to kill the werewolf, during the scene in the porno theater David asks Jack "Won't I need a silver bullet?" Jack's response is "Pfff, Please."

That being said this movie is 31 years old and the question that somebody might reasonably ask is, especially with horror movies is, does it hold up? Well, the answer to that is yes and no. Landis injects a lot of comedy into this movie, quite a lot in fact: From the banter of Jack and David at the beginning to the entire sequence of David trying to get back to Alex's flat from the zoo after his first full moon, there's some pretty funny stuff. The scenes between David and Jack as a corpse are also played for the comedy and not the horror and give the movie a campy vibe that even Landis' comedies don't have. It might have played well in 1981, and while it is funny, it doesn't work in the context of the rest of the film.

The plot itself is a bit cliched as well, even with the idea brought in with the undead. There's only so much you can do with werewolf cinema and honestly you just have to be a fan of the genre in general to enjoy most of these movies, even those that try to inject something new to the genre. So Landis can be forgiven I think for this, he tried and did not completely succeed, but at least he tried.

That being said there are moments of this film that shine. The scene on the moors, even though it looks a bit dated actually ramps up the tension quite nicely. As does a scene in the subway after David turns. And, if you haven't seen it, there's one scene that makes this movie worth watching: where David turns into a werewolf for the first time. This is an iconic movie scene these days and it's no wonder why. It still looks pretty awesome today. There's certainly some falseness to the scene during a couple of moments, but we've been trained through the years to look through special effects. There's no denying that Rich Baker's effects were top notch for this scene, and they still are. It looks like bones are breaking and adjusting. You can see the sheen of sweat on David's face as he changes and it feels like the screams of pain are genuine. This is a monster who's only part blood lust, the rest is pain. This scene alone is worth watching, and makes the rest of the movie worth watching just so you have a broader context.

So while the movie isn't particular good by today's standards, it's still become a classic horror film and is definitely worth a watch if you are a fan of the genre.

2 1/2 Beards out of 5.

Labels: